Claude Opus 5
claude-opus-5
70% in · 30% out mix
Higher = better value
Speed
63/100
Context
1.0M
Tier
power
Claude 3 Opus
claude-3-opus
70% in · 30% out mix
Higher = better value
Speed
50/100
Context
200K
Tier
power
IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS
Claude Opus 5 vs Claude 3 Opus: Detailed Comparison
Claude Opus 5 is Anthropic's flagship-tier language model with a 1.0M-token context window, excelling at coding. Claude 3 Opus from Anthropic is a flagship-tier model supporting 200K tokens in context, with standout performance in reasoning.
Claude Opus 5 is both the cheaper and the stronger model here — it costs 67% less than Claude 3 Opus on a typical prompt/completion mix and still leads on combined coding and reasoning by 27 points. There is no tradeoff to weigh on this pair: unless you need something specific from Claude 3 Opus, the cheaper model is simply the better one. Claude Opus 5 is priced at $5.00/M input tokens and $25.00/M output tokens. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output.
In independent benchmark evaluations, Claude Opus 5 leads with coding scores of 99/100 and reasoning scores of 98/100, compared to Claude 3 Opus's 80/100 in coding and 90/100 in reasoning.
Capability breakdown
Across the five core benchmark categories, here is how Claude Opus 5 and Claude 3 Opus stack up head to head:
Best model by task
- coding: Claude Opus 5 wins with 99/100
- reasoning: Claude Opus 5 wins with 98/100
- data extraction: Claude Opus 5 wins with 96/100
- creative tasks: Claude Opus 5 wins with 96/100
- vision/multimodal: Claude Opus 5 wins with 95/100
Estimated monthly cost at scale
At 10M + 2M per month, Claude Opus 5 runs about $100.00 while Claude 3 Opus runs about $300.00 — Claude Opus 5 saves roughly $200.00 (67%) every month.
What actually decides it
Both models come from Anthropic, so they share a tokenizer, an API surface, and a billing account. Switching between them is a model-string change and nothing else — no new SDK, no re-tokenizing your prompts to re-estimate cost, no second vendor to onboard. That makes routing between them far cheaper to implement than a cross-vendor split.
These are the same lab's model at the same tier, 28 months apart — so this is an upgrade question, not a choice between alternatives. Claude Opus 5 is the current entry; Claude 3 Opus is here because plenty of production traffic still runs on it. If you are starting something new there is little reason to pick the older one, and if you are already on it the question is whether the migration cost is worth the gain.
The context gap is the largest single difference on this pair: Claude Opus 5 takes 1.0M tokens against 200K for Claude 3 Opus, roughly 5.0x. That is the difference between feeding in a whole repository or a full contract set and having to chunk it. If your work involves documents you cannot split cleanly, this decides it on its own.
Throughput is close enough to ignore — 63/100 versus 50/100. Neither model will feel noticeably quicker in an interactive product, so latency is not a reason to choose between them.
One practical asymmetry: Claude Opus 5 offers a batch API at 50% off standard rates, and Claude 3 Opus does not. For anything that does not need an answer immediately — nightly enrichment, backfills, evaluation runs — that discount can be worth more than the difference in list price, and it is easy to overlook when comparing headline rates.
Claude Opus 5 wins this comparison outright — cheaper and stronger. Choose Claude 3 Opus only if it has a specific capability you need; on price and benchmarks it is behind on both.
Benchmark Comparison
Head-to-head scores across 5 categories — sourced from official evals
Coding
Reasoning
Extraction
Creative
Vision
Speed Score
Context Window
What Is a Token?
Models don't read words — they process tokens.
A token is roughly 4 characters of English text (~¾ of a word). Your API bill is priced per million tokens — understanding this directly reduces your costs.
Short phrase
"Hello, world!"
- Claude Opus 5
- $2.20
- Claude 3 Opus
- $6.48
Business email
One typical email (~200 words)
- Claude Opus 5
- $148.50
- Claude 3 Opus
- $437.40
Code file
50-line Python script
- Claude Opus 5
- $220.00
- Claude 3 Opus
- $648.00
Prices shown are for 100,000 runs of each workload — one run costs a fraction of a cent on both Claude Opus 5 and Claude 3 Opus, so the number only becomes meaningful at production volume. Input tokens only; add your output volume in the calculator below.
How to check your token usage
response.usage.total_tokensEvery API response includes a usage object. Sum total_tokens across all calls to get your monthly figure, then use the calculator below.
Your Cost Calculator
Enter your actual monthly token usage to see real savings
Quick Presets
Claude Opus 5
$330.00/mo
$3,960.00/yr
Claude 3 Opus
$990.00/mo
$11,880.00/yr
Annual Savings
$7,920.00 saved per year
Claude Opus 5 cheaper · $660.00/mo
Deep-Dive Audit — Claude Opus 5 & Claude 3 Opus
Surgically Auditing: Deep Logic
3-YEAR STRATEGIC LOSS PROJECTION
$991.404
Without optimization protocols, current model choices will result in $330.468 capital loss per year.
EFFICIENCY SCORE
98%
This model achieves a 98 benchmark score in this category.
CATEGORY GAP
2 pts
Distance from Leader
Competitive Landscape Analysis
Source: MMLU-Pro + GPQA Diamond (Apr 2026)
Category Champion: Claude Fable 5
According to MMLU-Pro + GPQA Diamond (Apr 2026) data, Claude Fable 5 provides the optimum balance for Deep Logic tasks.
Market Score
%100
Savings Rate
%92
Operational Prescription
- Implement model cascading to optimize token spend.
- Analyze complex_reasoning data to leverage local semantic caching.
COST AUDIT PROTOCOL
Overkill Detected
"Claude Opus 5 is overpriced for this task type. Claude Fable 5 scores 100 in this category at a fraction of the cost."
Categorical Alternative Opportunity
"Claude Fable 5 leads this category with 100 points according to MMLU-Pro + GPQA Diamond (Apr 2026) data."
Inertia Tax Detected
"85% of traffic can be routed to cheaper models. Fast tier (GPT-5 Nano) and Smart tier (o3-mini) can save $27.54/month."
3-Tier Intelligent Routing Architecture
92% SAVINGS VIA ROUTINGGPT-5 Nano
IQ Score: 72/100
$18.00/yr
o3-mini
IQ Score: 97/100
$277.20/yr
DeepSeek R1
IQ Score: 97/100
$59.184/yr
Without tiered routing, you pay the 'Inertia Tax' — routing all traffic to the most expensive model regardless of task complexity. Tiered cascade eliminates $3,965.616/year in avoidable overhead.
Deep Logic — Model Cost / Quality Matrix
Source: MMLU-Pro + GPQA Diamond (Apr 2026)| Model | Benchmark | Input (per M) | Output (per M) | Annual Cost* | Value Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Claude Fable 5LEADER | 100/100 | $10.00 | $50.00 | $720.00 | 5/100 |
GPT-5.6 Sol | 99/100 | $5.00 | $30.00 | $420.00 | 8/100 |
Claude Opus 5SELECTED | 98/100 | $5.00 | $25.00 | $360.00 | 9/100 |
Claude Opus 4.6 | 98/100 | $5.00 | $25.00 | $360.00 | 9/100 |
DeepSeek R1BEST VALUE | 97/100 | $0.55 | $2.19 | $32.88 | 100/100 |
Claude Opus 4.8 | 96/100 | $5.00 | $25.00 | $360.00 | 9/100 |
Claude 3 Opus | 90/100 | $15.00 | $75.00 | $1,080.00 | 3/100 |
Llama 3.1 405B | 88/100 | $2.70 | $2.70 | $64.80 | 46/100 |
* Annual cost for given volumes. Value Index = Score / Cost (Higher = Best Value).
// iOPTERA Surgical Routing Wrapper
const auditModel = async (prompt: string) => {
const complexity = measureComplexity(prompt);
// Tactical Cascade Logic
if (complexity < 0.45) {
// Redirect simple tasks to efficient model
return await llm.call("iOPTERA Optimization", prompt);
}
// High-latency routing for complex reasoning
return await llm.call("Claude Fable 5", prompt);
};Related Comparisons
Explore similar model pairs to find your best fit