Cost and performance comparison
GPT-4o vs DeepSeek V3
Model AOpenAI
GPT-4o
- Cost / 1M Tokens
- $4.75
- 70% in · 30% out mix
- Value Index (score÷cost)
- 18.9
- Higher = better value
- Speed
- 90/100
- Context
- 128K
- Tier
- Smart Tier
List price from the OpenAI pricing page, verified September 30, 2026.
Check the sourceModel BDeepSeek
DeepSeek V3
- Cost / 1M Tokens
- $0.52
- 70% in · 30% out mix
- Value Index (score÷cost)
- 158.7
- Higher = better value
- Speed
- 85/100
- Context
- 128K
- Tier
- Fast Tier
Last list price before the model was retired.
Across the 25 languages we measured, it needs about 21% more tokens than OpenAI's for the same text. Costs by language
In-depth analysis
GPT-4o vs DeepSeek V3: Detailed Comparison
GPT-4o is OpenAI's mid-range-tier language model with a 128K-token context window, excelling at vision/multimodal. DeepSeek V3 from DeepSeek is a lightweight-tier model supporting 128K tokens in context, with standout performance in data extraction.
GPT-4o costs 9.0x what DeepSeek V3 does for the same text. That is a steep premium, and it buys a 9-point lead on combined coding and reasoning. Whether that trade is worth it depends entirely on how much of your traffic actually needs the harder model — for most workloads the honest answer is a small fraction of it, which is an argument for routing rather than for picking one. GPT-4o is priced at $2.50/M input tokens and $10.00/M output tokens. DeepSeek V3 costs $0.27/M input and $1.10/M output.
On iOPTERA's editorial scores, GPT-4o leads with 87/100 for coding and 90/100 for reasoning, against DeepSeek V3's 84/100 and 84/100.
Capability breakdown
Across the five core benchmark categories, here is how GPT-4o and DeepSeek V3 stack up head to head:
Best model by task
- coding: GPT-4o wins with 87/100
- reasoning: GPT-4o wins with 90/100
- data extraction: GPT-4o wins with 92/100
- creative tasks: GPT-4o wins with 92/100
- vision/multimodal: GPT-4o wins with 95/100
Estimated monthly cost at scale
For 10M + 2M tokens of text a month (counted the way OpenAI's tokenizer counts), GPT-4o runs about $45.00 while DeepSeek V3 runs about $5.00 — DeepSeek V3 saves roughly $40.00 (89%) every month.
What actually decides it
GPT-4o and DeepSeek V3 come from different labs, which means different tokenizers, different API shapes, and a second vendor relationship. The same English text does not produce the same token count on both, so a price-per-million comparison understates the difference — measure your own prompts on each before treating the headline rates as the full story.
DeepSeek V3 and GPT-4o were released within 7 months of each other, so they are competing on the same evaluations under roughly the same conditions. That makes a direct benchmark comparison meaningful here in a way it usually is not — neither model has the advantage of being measured on a newer, easier set of tests.
Context is effectively a tie: 128K against 128K. Neither model unlocks a document size the other cannot handle, so this axis should not enter the decision. If you were hoping context would break the tie for you, it will not.
Throughput is close enough to ignore — 90/100 versus 85/100. Neither model will feel noticeably quicker in an interactive product, so latency is not a reason to choose between them.
One practical asymmetry: GPT-4o offers a batch API at 50% off standard rates, and DeepSeek V3 does not. For anything that does not need an answer immediately — nightly enrichment, backfills, evaluation runs — that discount can be worth more than the difference in list price, and it is easy to overlook when comparing headline rates.
GPT-4o is 9.0x the price of DeepSeek V3. Reserve it for the requests that actually need it and route the rest to DeepSeek V3 — that hybrid beats either model used alone on cost per useful answer.
What you actually pay
The list price is only the start. Prompt caching, batch processing and long prompts change the bill, and each provider sets them differently. Prices per 1M tokens.
| Pricing term | GPT-4o | DeepSeek V3 |
|---|---|---|
| List price (input / output) | $2.50 / $10.00 | $0.27 / $1.10 |
| Cached input | $1.2550% of the input price | — |
| Batch API | 50% off input and output | — |
| Long prompts | — | — |
| Input with 80% cache hits | $1.50 | — |
Capability scores
iOPTERA editorial scores across 5 categories — informed by public benchmarks, not measured by us
Coding
Reasoning
Extraction
Creative
Vision
Speed Score
Context Window
What Is a Token?
Models don't read words — they process tokens.
A token is roughly 4 characters of English text (~¾ of a word). Your API bill is priced per million tokens — understanding this directly reduces your costs.
Short phrase
"Hello, world!"
- GPT-4o
- $1.00
- DeepSeek V3
- $0.11
Business email
One typical email (~200 words)
- GPT-4o
- $67.50
- DeepSeek V3
- $7.44
Code file
50-line Python script
- GPT-4o
- $100.00
- DeepSeek V3
- $11.02
Prices shown are for 100,000 runs of each workload — one run costs a fraction of a cent on both GPT-4o and DeepSeek V3, so the number only becomes meaningful at production volume. Input tokens only; add your output volume in the calculator below.
How to check your token usage
response.usage.total_tokensEvery API response includes a usage object. Sum total_tokens across all calls to get your monthly figure, then use the calculator below.
Your Cost Calculator
Enter your actual monthly token usage to see real savings
Quick Presets
GPT-4o
$142.50/mo
$1,710.00/yr
DeepSeek V3
$15.88/mo
$190.58/yr
Annual Savings
$1,519.42 saved per year
DeepSeek V3 cheaper · $126.62/mo
Related Comparisons
Explore similar model pairs to find your best fit
GPT-4ovsGPT-6 Luna
$2.50 · $0.10/M input
GPT-4ovsGPT-5.6 Terra
$2.50 · $2.00/M input
GPT-4ovsClaude Sonnet
$2.50 · $2.00/M input
GPT-4ovsGrok 4.5
$2.50 · $2.00/M input
GPT-4ovsGPT-5.2
$2.50 · $1.75/M input
GPT-4ovsGemini 3.1
$2.50 · $2.00/M input
DeepSeek V3vsDeepSeek V4.1
$0.27 · $0.30/M input
DeepSeek V3vsGPT-5.6 Luna
$0.27 · $0.20/M input