o3-mini
OpenAI · Released January 2025
Input Price
$1.10
per 1M tokens
Output Price
$4.40
per 1M tokens
Context Window
200K
tokens
Speed Score
78
out of 100
Benchmarks
Avg 85/100Pricing
Input
Prompt / context tokens
$1.10/ 1M
Output
Generated tokens
$4.40/ 1M
Batch API
Async processing discount
$0.55 / $2.20
50% off standard price
Best For
o3-mini in context
On a typical 70% input / 30% output mix, o3-mini blends to $2.09 per million tokens. That puts it above 34% of the 32 models tracked here, and 0 other models in the same mid-range tier undercut it. Tier is a capability label, not a price band — the spread inside one tier is often wider than the gap between tiers, which is why picking by tier alone tends to overspend.
Input runs $1.10 per million and output $4.40 — a 4.0x ratio. That ratio matters more than either number on its own: a summarisation or classification workload reads far more than it writes and will track the input price, while a code-generation or long-form writing workload inverts that and will track the output price. Compare models on the ratio your own traffic actually has, not on the input price alone.
The benchmark profile is uneven rather than flat: reasoning at 97/100 against vision at 72/100, a 25-point spread. An average hides that. If your workload sits on the strong end this model punches above its price; if it sits on the weak end, a cheaper model with a flatter profile will serve you better.
The context window is 200K tokens and the throughput score is 78/100. Context only earns its keep if you fill it, and filling it is also what makes a request expensive — a large window is an option, not a discount. For a mid-range-tier model, judge the speed score against what you are doing: it decides everything for interactive chat and almost nothing for overnight batch work.
Worth checking before you commit: DeepSeek R1 scores at least as well on combined coding and reasoning and blends to $1.04 per million against o3-mini's $2.09. That does not make o3-mini the wrong choice — context window, latency, vendor lock-in, and specific capabilities all sit outside a benchmark score — but it does mean the price difference needs a reason behind it.
The closest comparison is GPT-5.6 Terra from OpenAI, at $5.00 per million against $2.09. 3 models in this tier score higher on combined coding and reasoning, which is the useful framing: the question is rarely whether a model is good, it is whether it is the cheapest thing that is good enough for the specific work you are sending it.
What it costs in production
At 10M + 2M tokens a month — a realistic mid-size production workload — o3-mini runs about $19.80. Routing the latency-tolerant share through the batch API at 50% off would bring that to roughly $9.90, which is usually a bigger saving than switching models.
Price History
No price changes since launch
Strengths
- Best reasoning benchmark — ideal for math and science
- Chain-of-thought structured problem solving
- Good for agentic tasks requiring multi-step planning
- 50% batch discount
Avoid For
- Creative writing
- Simple chatbots and FAQ answering
- Vision tasks