Skip to content
optera

Cost and performance comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Model AAnthropic

Claude 3 Opus

Capability score (editorial)90/100
Cost / 1M Tokens
$33.00
70% in · 30% out mix
≈ $36.30 for the same text, tokenizer included
Value Index (score÷cost)
2.5
Higher = better value
Speed
50/100
Context
200K
Tier
Power Tier

Last list price before the model was retired.

Its tokenizer produces about 10% more tokens than OpenAI's for the same text, so the real cost runs higher than the list price suggests. This is an estimate: the tokenizer has not been measured yet.

How we verify prices

Model BAnthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Capability score (editorial)89/100
Cost / 1M Tokens
$6.60
70% in · 30% out mix
≈ $7.26 for the same text, tokenizer included
Value Index (score÷cost)
12.3
Higher = better value
Speed
95/100
Context
200K
Tier
Smart Tier

Last list price before the model was retired.

Its tokenizer produces about 10% more tokens than OpenAI's for the same text, so the real cost runs higher than the list price suggests. This is an estimate: the tokenizer has not been measured yet.

How we verify prices

In-depth analysis

Claude 3 Opus vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Detailed Comparison

Claude 3 Opus is Anthropic's flagship-tier language model with a 200K-token context window, excelling at reasoning. Claude 3.5 Sonnet from Anthropic is a mid-range-tier model supporting 200K tokens in context, with standout performance in creative tasks.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is both the cheaper and the stronger model here — for the same text it costs 80% less than Claude 3 Opus and still leads on combined coding and reasoning by 7 points. There is no tradeoff to weigh on this pair: unless you need something specific from Claude 3 Opus, the cheaper model is simply the better one. Claude 3 Opus is priced at $15.00/M input tokens and $75.00/M output tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output.

On iOPTERA's editorial scores, Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 88/100 for coding and 89/100 for reasoning, against Claude 3 Opus's 80/100 and 90/100.

Capability breakdown

Across the five core benchmark categories, here is how Claude 3 Opus and Claude 3.5 Sonnet stack up head to head:

coding
80
88
reasoning
90
89
data extraction
85
90
creative tasks
89
91
vision/multimodal
87
88

Best model by task

  • coding: Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins with 88/100
  • reasoning: Claude 3 Opus wins with 90/100
  • data extraction: Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins with 90/100
  • creative tasks: Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins with 91/100
  • vision/multimodal: Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins with 88/100

Estimated monthly cost at scale

For 10M + 2M tokens of text a month (counted the way OpenAI's tokenizer counts), Claude 3 Opus runs about $330.00 while Claude 3.5 Sonnet runs about $66.00 — Claude 3.5 Sonnet saves roughly $264.00 (80%) every month.

What actually decides it

Both models come from Anthropic, so they share a tokenizer, an API surface, and a billing account. Switching between them is a model-string change and nothing else — no new SDK, no re-tokenizing your prompts to re-estimate cost, no second vendor to onboard. That makes routing between them far cheaper to implement than a cross-vendor split.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude 3 Opus were released within 3 months of each other, so they are competing on the same evaluations under roughly the same conditions. That makes a direct benchmark comparison meaningful here in a way it usually is not — neither model has the advantage of being measured on a newer, easier set of tests.

Context is effectively a tie: 200K against 200K. Neither model unlocks a document size the other cannot handle, so this axis should not enter the decision. If you were hoping context would break the tie for you, it will not.

Latency separates them: Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores 95/100 against 50/100 for Claude 3 Opus, a 45-point gap. That matters for anything a person waits on — chat, autocomplete, interactive tools. For batch and background work it does not, and trading latency for capability there is usually the right call.

One practical asymmetry: Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers a batch API at 50% off standard rates, and Claude 3 Opus does not. For anything that does not need an answer immediately — nightly enrichment, backfills, evaluation runs — that discount can be worth more than the difference in list price, and it is easy to overlook when comparing headline rates.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins this comparison outright — cheaper and stronger. Choose Claude 3 Opus only if it has a specific capability you need; on price and benchmarks it is behind on both.

Capability scores

iOPTERA editorial scores across 5 categories — informed by public benchmarks, not measured by us

CategoryClaude 3Claude 3.5Winner

Coding

80
88
B

Reasoning

90
89
A

Extraction

85
90
B

Creative

89
91
B

Vision

87
88
B
Claude 3 Opus: 1 wins
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 4 wins
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads overall

Speed Score

50/100vs95/100
ClaudeClaude

Context Window

200Kvs200K
ClaudeClaude

What Is a Token?

Models don't read words — they process tokens.

A token is roughly 4 characters of English text (~¾ of a word). Your API bill is priced per million tokens — understanding this directly reduces your costs.

Short phrase

"Hello, world!"

4 tokens
Claude 3 Opus
$6.60
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
$1.32

Business email

One typical email (~200 words)

~270 tokens
Claude 3 Opus
$445.50
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
$89.10

Code file

50-line Python script

~400 tokens
Claude 3 Opus
$660.00
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
$132.00

Prices shown are for 100,000 runs of each workload — one run costs a fraction of a cent on both Claude 3 Opus and Claude 3.5 Sonnet, so the number only becomes meaningful at production volume. Input tokens only; add your output volume in the calculator below.

How to check your token usage

response.usage.total_tokens

Every API response includes a usage object. Sum total_tokens across all calls to get your monthly figure, then use the calculator below.

Your Cost Calculator

Enter your actual monthly token usage to see real savings

Quick Presets

30M tokens
Prompt 70%Completion 30%

Claude 3 Opus

$1,089.00/mo

$13,068.00/yr

$15.00/M input$75.00/M output
Cheaper

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

$217.80/mo

$2,613.60/yr

$3.00/M input$15.00/M output

Annual Savings

$10,454.40 saved per year

Claude 3.5 Sonnet cheaper · $871.20/mo

Related Comparisons

Explore similar model pairs to find your best fit